LES MISERABLES, starring Hugh Jackman

The theater was crowded, and I was stuck sitting by two little girls whose mother (she sat in the row ahead) did not turn around (as I would have done) to tell them not to watch horribly violent previews. Probably because she was texting and trying to quiet the baby at the same time.

Still, I enjoyed the movie, though I continually worried about the little girls—lots of violence, including the shooting of little Gavroche and the mess in the sewer.

Too, toward the end, when Marius sings “empty tables, empty chairs,” and laments the dying of the children, and I was still sitting by a sweet little six-year-old with shiny boots that lit up when she knocked them together, I was almost unable to breathe, so immediate was the sense of what happened those few awful days ago.

I was concerned that I wouldn’t like Anne Hathaway, because I don’t like Anne Hathaway. However, she gives a remarkable performance, her singing lovely, passionate, raw.

Mr. Jackman as Jean Valjean obviously holds the film together, and his singing voice is certainly listenable. Less easy to enjoy is Russell Crowe’s singing, which is all one big forte with no finesse and no variation, but then, Javert never has finesse or variation, so perhaps that was the correct way to approach the part, but it grated on me after a while.

Marius is adorable and sings beautifully, but I was a tiny bit annoyed by the way his lower jaw moves along with his vibrato, a trait often seen on Sunday mornings, and which is probably not out of place in the sanctuary, but struck me as odd behind the barricade.

I am probably the only person in the world who hadn’t seen the play, and I am a tiny bit ashamed to say that I was put off by the amount of singing—I looked forward to seeing a Sound of Music type musical, where most of the dialogue is spoken, but then occasionally (as when one doesn’t know what to do with Maria) emotion overtops someone and she breaks into song. Here, a great deal of the dialogue is sung, and, at the beginning, it is all sung, so that I was afraid I had stumbled into a latter-day opera by mistake.

I didn’t know any of the songs other than the one I heard once upon a time on Britain’s Got Talent. It was done much better here, I’m happy to say.

Helena Bonham Carter as Madame Thenardier is brilliant. Having seen Ms. Bonham Carter as an ape, a witch, a toothpaste factory worker’s wife, and a queen, seeing her as a cruel buffoon (maritally shackled to the odious Baron Cohen, if I may speak plainly) was something else. One can’t help but wonder what she and Mr. Burton talk about in the quiet evenings after the children have gone to bed, but “bizarre parts Helena gets to play” must be among the topics.

Please don’t take children to this. There is a scene with a bunch of sad, used prostitutes in which Fantine (to be blunt) turns a trick. There is another scene where Father Christmas is roughly handled (shall we say) by a rather energetic young woman.

A poignant moment occurs in the rain when Eponine Thenardier (Samantha Barks) realizes that Marius will never love her, except when she’s alone with her thoughts, now that he has met Cosette. That sad moment when a young woman realizes she cannot have what she cannot have…

A lovely movie all in all. The music is wow, especially the big crowd pieces about poor people and angry men. Lots of touching moments.

I like the Liam Neeson version better, because there’s no singing, there’s more story, no one has sex with Santa Claus, and there’s Geoffrey Rush, but this one is also great. Just sit a little farther away from the woman who brings four little children. I would have moved, but the theater was jam-packed.

Sadly, no one will ever read the book (which is magnificent) ever again because of having seen one or more of the movie adaptations, but at least the movies show the good bits–the self-sacrifice, the toiling for truth and justice and liberty, the loveliness of first true love…and the fact that our Revolution was way better done, but that may be an uncalled-for observation.

Lots and lots of Oscar nominations will be forthcoming: certainly for Mr. Jackman, Ms. Hathaway, the music, the costumes, and art direction, for starters.

6 thoughts on “LES MISERABLES, starring Hugh Jackman”

  1. Thank you for the excellent review. Some films should be seen on the big screen with the sound up loud. I am pleased to add this to my short list of films to.see in the theater as Hugh Jackman was so awesome in Oklahoma. please see OK with your children). If any small children are present, I will gladly leave to watch Jack Reacher again.

  2. Les Mis is my favorite book ever; must reread it during late-night baby feedings. In the meantime, I am dying to see this movie! Loved your review.

  3. Of the non-singing movies, I have to agree that Liam Neeson’s was the best (although the one with Richard Jordan as Valjean and Anthony Perkins as Javert is a commendable second). But I have to disagree that the movie version is better than the musical. Having seen the stage version a half a dozen times (including New York but regrettably not London), I do not believe the lyrics of the songs are second to any mere film script. The musical has so captured my heart that I cannot allow mere acting performance to trump the raw emotion, lyrical complexity, and compositional beauty of the musical. This particular movie had its faults (both in acting and singing performance), but…oh…the glory of the songs…and oh, the triumph of the message! Even with the movie version out and even with my half dozen experiences, I will still pay the $100 orchestra section price to experience this again!

  4. I can’t stop talking about Les Mis (or, actually, thinking about it). One way that this musical is different from the Sound of Music-type is that the songs are meant to carry the message rather than just the emotion. For example, Sound of Music has My Favorite Things to help the story express suppression of fear. Les Mis uses the songs over and over to show the law/mercy contrast and even the self-concern/others-concern contrast. At the beginning, Valjean sings in the conflict of his soul after being confronted by the bishop’s love/mercy. Valjean recognizes that this conflicts with everything he has known and has to decide whether to go on in this new knowledge. At the end, Javert has the same thing happen to him. He is confronted by the love/mercy of Valjean and realizes the exact same conflict in his soul. His song is the SAME TUNE as the one Valjean sang at the beginning. Many of the words overlap or are similar in the soul conflict theme. And Javert knows with the new knowledge he must be different going on. But unlike Valjean, he cannot leave the past and therefore commits suicide. Valjean sang, “I’ll escape now from that world…from the world of Jean Valjean” as mercy drove him to becomes a better person. Javert sings, “There is no way to go on” as mercy drove him to his death. Over and over and over the songs complement each other as they fashion the philosophy. Particularly impressive are the multiple-singer songs. The duet of Valjean and Javert at Fantine’s death; the trio of Marius, Cosette, and Eponine; and the entire cast in the One Day More subplot-weaving per-intermission climax. It takes my breath away just to remember and write about these. Movie or musical in the balance? Oh my goodness!! The movie is a nice story, but GIVE ME THE MUSIC and let it flood over my soul!!

Comments are closed.